Smart Phones - Dumb Docks

Posted by Nick

 
Motorola Atrix 4G

The new phone from Moto, the Atrix 4G is quite a bad ass. Dual-core processor, 4" 960x540px screen, 1gb RAM and the ability to dock itself into at least two super cool accessories. The one you see above is on it's own, totally useless, but you can pop the little Atrix into the back, it turns into a dual core netbook with 4G wireless access. Pretty fucking awesome. There's also a desktop dock (video below). When your phone gets it's docking on, you get a full version of Firefox (with all the saved tabs you had open on your phone) along with access to the file system of the phone and an environment that looks just like laptop/desktop computer.

While I'm obviously very excited by products like this, you have to ask; how long will a hardware docking setup like this stay relevant? The Gdgt article I read about this thinks this could be the wave of the future:

You wouldn't need to travel for business with a laptop anymore, and you could just pop your phone into a dock at the hotel and then into another dock at your office, another at a cafe, etc

He does point out that for this future to be possible, a standard dock and OS would have to be established for all devices...which I've seen stranger things, but it's not terribly likely. He asks that Google take on this standardization responsible and also points out where my head was going with this, it sorta conflicts with ChromeOSand where Google see's the future going.

Google doesn't care which hardware or OS you're on really...they just want you to have a web connection, a browser and to be logged into their massive and growing cloud network. If I could use ANY piece of computing hardware with internet and a browser (Mac, PC, Linux, gameboy...) as long as I'm logged into Google, I have access to all my apps and files. That's where things are moving. As 4G becomes the new 3G and 5G on the approaching horizon, people will have constant and instant access to every part of their digital life. 

Now with all that said, if the Atrix's buddy docks are a reasonably price, I'd reluctantly sell my Evo (I really love my Evo) and Asus Netbook to use this as one unified portable hardware solution. 

Source: Gdgt.com

Evo 4G - is it really "4G"?

Posted by Nick

 
4g-speed

There's a lot of talk about if Sprint's 4G is or isn't "true 4G". Before we get into what is/isn't 4G, here are some speed(kbps) numbers from my Evo here in Chicago:

  • Lowest: 793 up | 1039 down
  • Highest: 3463 up | 1001 down
  • Rough average: 2300(ish) up  | 1000 down (Sprint caps upload at 1000kbps)
For reference, my RCN home cable gets almost 4000kbps up and 700kbps down. My wireless is quickly catching up with my cable :)

A good friend of mine (Jeff) points out:

The International Telecomunication Union (ITU) requires 4G networks to provide download speeds of at least 100 mbps. Current high-speed networks only achieve roughly 3% of this speed, so "4G" is merely a marketing term used by Sprint and other networks to note that this is their fourth generation network.

Agreed, the marketers are using this term to help define the next speed bracket of their wireless service. And while the ITU may have written the "book" on wireless specs, these "required" 4G speeds are bullshit. Determining that 100mbps down is “true 4G” just doesn't make any real world sense. Especially considering we don't (widely) have these speeds as wired internet services at home. Shit, my wireless network (not internet speed, just network) at home is still only 54mbps and that's if I'm right next to my router. I don't hardly expect to get speeds greater on my phone than I do at my local home network.

Let's assume that the "G" here in "1/2/3/4 G" is to stand for “Generation”. Then the next G(eneration) of wireless should be determined by what this new generation can do for us. For instance:

  • 1G = calls, text
  • 2G = WAP sites, maaabye do mapping
  • 3G = mobile formatted sites, mapping, some very compressed video, stream music
  • 4G = full websites, flash games, higher quality video, video chat, really fast maps/navigation
  • 5G = the phone becomes a “thin” client and can harness it's extremely fast wireless connection to tap into the full power of your desktop at home, full HD video, to infinity and beyond...
 
Honestly, I don't mind marketers calling Sprint's 4G wireless service "4G". For myself it's opened up new doors to wireless computing. In the USA, this is a bleeding edge technology, and it's still an immature network. I look forward to see how Sprint continues to upgrade it. Plus it's better than marketers selling poor chaps 720p TVs to people as "HD".

Image Source: Packet Data Everywhere!

Evo 4G Review - Part 2: Sprint & 4G

Posted by Nick

 

Evocrushiphone_1

(Picture of my first iPhone after it's disastrous fight with my Evo. (aka it fell from several feet)) 


Continued today is my coverage of the Evo 4G. Previously I covered the hardware and now it's time to talk about Sprint's network that carries my data bits to and fro, including 4G.

Sprint

In about 2003, I switched to Cingular from Nextel (who is ironically now Sprint). I made this switch for the greater selection of new phones and the ability to import foreign phones which are far more advanced. I did this for several years, basking in the glory of having too-good-for-the-US hardware in my hand. 

Then the iPhone came out. It changed the world of cell phones and mobile computing. After many long discussions with my close friend, we came to the conclusion that the iPhone was the best phone you could buy. So I used that for 2 years, and during this time I personally found that our conclusion was horribly wrong.

The iPhone is a great piece of technology, a mini-computer that raised the bar for Human-Computer interactions for all devices, changed the world's perspective on what a smartphone is. Yet ultimately, it's a terrible phone. Whether this is AT&Ts or Apple's fault, I don't care...when I had that phone, in this city, I could hardly ever make a call from my house, at work, and on the train. When it did connect, I swear to whatever god it dropped my calls at least 50% of the time.

Three weeks in, the Evo on Sprint's network continues to surprise me. Every time I hit the "Call" button, the phone instantly responds with a slight buzz indicating the call is connected and ringing...what a novelty! On top of that, I get signal everywhere I've been and I've yet to wait for network bars to fill up to make a call. Sprint's 3G network in Chicago is great and I'm taking full advantage of it.

However, I am slightly worried about rural coverage. I've heard reports that Sprint may be very solid in urban areas but once you leave them, the name of the game is Roaming. In late July, I'll be taking a trip to the middle-of-nowhere Michigan, and I'll get my first real chance to test this out. 

As for the Chicago suburbs, 3G held strong. I took an hour-long drive out there this past weekend, from my garage in the city to the Grayslake area, a route that I was used to experience frequent signal drops. But feeling confident with Sprint, I fired up Pandora, plugged the Evo into the AUX jack of my other favorite possession:

Trackday_-_mazdaspeed3

In the two hours of driving, I felt like I was in the future. I bypassed the archaic FM tuner and instead floated digital bits of music to my phone, through my car, and into my ears, uninterrupted, for the entire trip to and fro. I know Pandora streaming over cell networks has been around for a while...but for some reason this felt totally new and exciting. With this new found confidence and reassurance of the music not cutting out, I find myself using this setup more and more. It's awesome.
 

4G

4g_headline2

Sprint_4g_wimax_htc_evo_4g_map

Here in Chicago, we're one of the lucky cities to be blanketed in succulent 4G coverage. As one of my friends put it, it's like having a "mobile land line" to the interwebs, just like being plugged in at home. It's that fast. Game changing fast. When I load a website, the mobile version pops in like it was stored on the phone. I'll try to hunt down the button to load the full version site and in the matter of 3-4 seconds the entire site is loaded. Each map tile loads almost instantly and makes scrolling around to find a route a pleasant experience. "Sexy..." as another friend put it while browsing satellite imagery of Chicago. For those who care, average speeds are 2 to 3.5 mb/s down and 1mb up (which is capped by Sprint), with response times around 50-100ms.

Battery life while using 4G takes a hit. So I toggle it on only when needed, which takes about 10-15 seconds for the Evo to connect to the fat data pipe and away I go.

As for obtaining and maintaining a 4G signal, it's hit or miss. When I do need it, I can connect about 75% of the time. Not having 4G a quarter of the time kinda sucks... kinda. I still always have 3G, which works in a pinch. I think it comes down to perception. If in 2 years from now, when other 4G networks are out there and running strong, and I still can only connect 75% of the time, I'll be pissed. But for now, it's a luxury and one that I'm happy to enjoy when I can get it.

Even if you're not in a 4G zone, Sprint says they'll be covering significantly more parts of the US by the year's end. Specifically, New York, LA, and San Fran will have it by the end of this Summer (2010).

 

Next up, the 3rd and final chapter: Software.

 

This is not the "4G" you were looking for...

Posted by Nick

 
 
All this talk of the lost/recovered 4g (4th generation) iPhone has bored the crap out of me. All I care about is the real 4G... The HTC EVO 4G on sale June 4 for $199
 
The iPhone doesn't even deserve to be compared to this much awesome... so I'll let the Evo's stats stand on their own:
  • 4G (WiMax 3-10mb/s)
  • Android (2.1)
  • 8mp camera, with flash
  • 720p video camera
  • Video chat, through the 2nd front facing camera
  • 1ghz Processor
  • 9gb storage (up to 41gb with SD card)
  • 480x800 4.3 screen
  • HDMI out
  • Share it's 4G connection with up to 8 other devices through wifi!
Fuck yeah. 
 
I'll be outside my Sprint store, very early, on June 4th. You should be too. 
 
 
Update: Engadget has some hands on videos. <drool>

Under Construction - iPhone OS

Posted by Nick

 

As I type this, Gizmodo's live coverage of the iPhone OS 4.0 is getting started. I'm exceedingly interested in the new features, updated interface design, and how this new OS will affect the design, reputation, and perception of any other mobile device that is released after it. Another question that (might) be answered is how will this OS better integrate with the iPad hardware. I've seen some remarkable new apps (or updates of existing apps) that do a fantastic job of using the tablets larger resolution/size, but the base OS is more akin to Farley's "Fat guy in a little coat" than a proper implementation of a mobile OS on a 10" screen. Just look at the home screen for chirst sake...

Image001

all that unused space. Even if you fill it up with uncategorized icons, it's still inefficient. Good design always needs white space, but this is just a waste of valuable pixels. The mockup below, shows how the space can be used more efficiently while still maintaining breathing room for all the elements. It's got some great data feeds that don't require you to open an app to get a glance at what's going on in your always connected life.

Image002

It's not perfect, but at least it's the right direction. As it stands, OS 3 is sorely behind it's competitors. Not that Apple has ever aimed to be the most feature laden... focusing instead on making fewer things work well. But their competition, like Android;

Web OS;

Image003


Windows Phone 7;

Image004

are all doing far more and still makes doing everyday tasks easy.

As much as I sometimes hate to admit it, I've loved using my iPhone for the past 2-3 years. Its totally changed the our expectations of what a phone should do for us. It set the bar in more ways than can be counted. When I test out a new phone (Droid, Pre, any HTC phone, etc), the first thing I do is test the responsiveness of the screen and how quickly I can access maps, mail, web, ect. The first phone I've touched, since the iPhone came out, that came anywhere near to "feeling right" was the Nexus One. I expect Pinch-to-Zoom (multi touch in general), accurate screen touches, a somewhat consistent UI between Apps, and solid integration of social media...just to name a few. But now, I expect even more than the iPhone can offer, Multitasking, apps that aren't "approved" by one single inconsistent body, better app organization, higher levels of customization. Thank god for Jailbreaking to get me through these couple of years, it's truly made the iPhone, MY phone with much improved functionality (themes, folders, file access, wifi hotspot, NES emulation, info widgets for the lock screen, video recording on my 3G, and the list goes on).

Unless Apple pulls some amazing shit out of their ass today, they're going to start losing people like me to the "underdogs", Google and Microsoft. For years now, I've said "The iPhone is the best phone you can get for any price", but it's not true anymore. Even at their $99-199 prices, it's not. I already know my next phone, it's the HTC Evo 4G, and there's little Apple can do today to convince me to stick with them. But we'll see ;)

 

UPDATE: Apple announced some pretty impressive stuff. We're looking at: "Multitasking, folders, improved Mail, iBooks, enterprise stuff, preview of Game Center and iAd." Check out the full detailed list.

 

1 page of 1